The Global Urbanist

News and analysis of cities around the world


Legal battles and fraud claims stalling Kibera upgrade

Several months after residents of Kibera's 'Soweto East' settlement were decanted into temporary housing, the process of returning them to permanent housing is stalled by legal battles over ownership of the sites. At the same time, residents are upset at the culture of bribery surrounding the decanting operation, with non-residents paying their way into new apartments, and others who couldn't pay being denied housing.

Cities: Nairobi

Topics: Property, rights and evictions, Crime and security, Internal migration

Efforts to upgrade one of the largest slums in Africa remain in limbo because of legal action, leaving hundreds of families wondering when they will be able to quit their 'temporary' apartments.

A court case has been brought by about a dozen people who claim ownership of structures in Soweto East, one of 13 'villages' in Nairobi's sprawling Kibera settlement that has been earmarked for improvement.

Seven years after the Kenyan government and UN-HABITAT launched the Kenya Slum Upgrading Project (KENSUP), and months after residents were 'decanted' into flats a couple of kilometres away, demolition of the village has yet to start.

"There are dissenting parties, structure owners, who took the Ministry of Housing to court and the case [is] currently before a judge. Construction [of 1,300 homes and amenities] cannot go on until a ruling is made," Leah Muraguri, KENSUP's director in the Ministry, told IRIN.

"The timeframe of how long is currently unpredictable," she added.

Graft claims

According to several Kibera residents, the relocation process was marred by bribery. This allegedly allowed some 200 outsiders to be given flats at the decanting site.

"I know of some people who paid between KSh 3,000 and 6,000 [US $37.50 - $75.00] to get rooms in the new blocks," a resident, who requested anonymity, told IRIN. "Even to get help to move your property to the flats, we had to pay something."

Another said she was not decanted for lack of money to pay bribes. "One of the officials came to my house three times asking me to pay him KSh 6,000 so that I could get allocated, but I refused to pay. Not that I had the money anyway," the resident said.

"The fraud did not begin with the movement to the new site, it goes way back to the enumeration period. Some officials made copies of the ID cards of genuine Kibera residents and superimposed the photos of those who had bribed them. After all, it was copies of the ID that [were] needed, not the original, during enumeration."

However, Patrick Munyayo, the organising secretary of the Kibera Settlement Executive Committee, which works with KENSUP, denied these claims, insisting all Soweto East residents, "who often know everyone else in the village," took part in the enumeration process.

And the Ministry of Housing's Muraguri told IRIN much was done to verify the bona fides of those given space in the decanting sites.

In response to complaints that some of the flats now housed more than a single family, the official said: "From the onset, the units were supposed to be shared and allocation was done based on preference of number of units allotted and their affordability as well, Several families are sharing a house that they needed and so could afford."

"It is important to note that that the amenities provided for the residents at the decanting site are good and far better than the standards of Kibera's Soweto East where they came from. The rooms were designed as three-roomed units with shared common facilities, which are the toilet and kitchen," she said.

Source: IRIN


blog comments powered by Disqus